[Mimedefang] Re: Simplified single purpose mimedefang-filter

[reader at newsguy.com]

"David F. Skoll" <dfs at roaringpenguin.com> writes:

> reader at newsguy.com wrote:
>
>>>sub filter_end {
>>>    add_recipient('archive-bot@[127.0.0.1]');
>>>}
>>>1;
>
>> That does look simple but what happens to the rest of 
>> /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter or do you mean that those four lines is
>>  mimedefang-filter 
>
> Those four lines are enough.  If the rest of the callbacks are missing,
> they are treated as no-ops.

Thanks... that was something that had me guessing.

>
> [...]
>
>> And silly me, I thought it was to take dangerous or spammious mail out
>> of circulation.
>
> Not really; MIMEDefang was designed for sysadmins who know Perl to
> mangle, slice and dice their e-mail with Perl. 


Point taken.... thanks again.