[Mimedefang] Problem using ClamAV

Tilman Schmidt t.schmidt at phoenixsoftware.de
Sat Feb 18 10:08:37 EST 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 18.02.2012 07:02, schrieb Jobst Schmalenbach:
> You're better of NOT using clamav through mimedefang, I used to do that
> to. You find loads of info in the internet why hooking it to sendmail is
> better.

Do you have a specific reference?
I've tried both alternatives too, and came to the conclusion that
calling ClamAV through MIMEDefang is better.

T.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk8/vvQACgkQ780oymN0g8NwVgCfanNH9YJrqHHXFN1PZdqmvSFs
2eIAn2ntU0iSrRfRjiYT+8LyunR6HrbW
=vMYD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the MIMEDefang mailing list