[Mimedefang] Message header madness - was Re: SPF Usefulness (was Re: SNARE spam detection)
skmimedefang at smail.inf.fh-bonn-rhein-sieg.de
Fri Jul 31 03:15:26 EDT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, - wrote:
> Remember that reply-to is supposed to be used specifically when it
> differs from the from header. I would suggest scoring positive points
> (towards spam) if they were IDENTICAL (as such implies that the message
> generator doesn't understand what it's doing or the purpose of
> reply-to). Doing stupid things often implies spamminess.
Because in the configuration place of many MUAs, the Reply-To address is
located in the very near of the mail address, some people may think they
_must_ fill a value there, because they won't get a reply otherwise.
I had some troubles with a very few mailing list managers as well, so I
tend to always add a Reply-to when mailing to lists.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the MIMEDefang