[Mimedefang] 100K SA limit doesn't seem to be enough any more :(

[Jan-Pieter Cornet]

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 02:21:22PM -0400, Cormack, Ken wrote:
> > By itself, it does not.  However see
> > http://www.sendmail.org/m4/anti_spam.html#delay_check
> 
> Agreed.  But again, management had input, and they got their way.  We should
> probably end this thread.  ;)

Sorry, couldn't resist. One should always try to learn from history.
History, in this case, is this mailinglists' archive. There was
an article mentioned here last year:

http://www.cio.com/article/128450/ABC_An_Introduction_to_E_mail_Management

... it's everything a CIO should know about email before making
decisions about it. Looks like in your case, they didn't. Which
disqualifies them from making decisions, and they should leave the
details to the qualified personel (ie: you, I assume :)

... or you could start wearing a gravity-defying tie to work to
make a point.

-- 
Jan-Pieter Cornet <johnpc at xs4all.nl>
!! Disclamer: The addressee of this email is not the intended recipient. !!
!! This is only a test of the echelon and data retention systems. Please !!
!! archive this message indefinitely to allow verification of the logs.  !!