[Mimedefang] Greylisting Code on Wiki
skmimedefang at smail.inf.fh-bonn-rhein-sieg.de
Thu Dec 13 03:26:21 EST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Anyone else using spamc and have any information to report? Since I use
> spamc/spamd on the same box, this seems like a no-brainer to implement but
> perhaps someone has a field-tested warning?
I do not use spamc, but an adoption of SpamAssassin::Client.pm
Post of mine from 12 Nov 2007 "Re: [Mimedefang] MIMEdefang and
In my experience it has no advantage over the MIMEDefang integrated
varaint out-of-the-box. You can easier implement user-specific scanning,
but SPAMD forks each time a request is made and there is almost no
resource sharing according the child's smaps statistics. Maybe I misread
the info. Then the user-config is loaded each time. I find the latency
quite heavy, therefore I pre-fork 5 children.
I was planning to try to see what's the difference, if you do not specify
an user, but had no time to re-configure and test til now.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the MIMEDefang