[Mimedefang] Auto Responders and SPAM
dbenigni at lutron.com
Wed Sep 27 16:42:01 EDT 2006
Thank you for the responses. The pattern has been clear for a while. :)
I just wanted to get everyone's opinion. I'd love to disable auto
responders to the outside world. Just keep them on for internal use. I
have doubts to whether that will fly or not.
>>> dfs at roaringpenguin.com 9/7/2006 6:55:19 PM >>>
David Benigni wrote:
> I have been bitten twice by SPAM email forging addresses, someone
> vacation rule send a message to a rbl trap account and my servers
> black listed.
> Other than disabling rules like this, has anyone some up with a way
> reduce this? I was think of using MIMEDefang to do this, but I
> to get community feedback first.
Well, I suppose that if something scores high on SpamAssassin, you
could add a Precedence: bulk or Precedence: junk header, which makes
some auto-responders not respond. (But this isn't guaranteed.)
Or you could add an Auto-Submitted: auto-replied header to the
mail, which makes some auto-responders not respond. (But this isn't
Do you see a pattern? ;-) There's no nice way to do this short of (1)
virtually guaranteeing that your auto-responder never gets fed a spam
message, or (2) disallowing auto-responders.
PS: If you *must* use an auto-responder, please make sure it behaves
at least as nicely as Sendmail's "vacation" program, which is one of
better-written auto-responders. I've banned a few people from this
list for using broken auto-responders.
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
More information about the MIMEDefang