[Mimedefang] Potential for Business mail servers tonot havereverse DNS
Les Mikesell
les at futuresource.com
Sun Sep 24 12:08:16 EDT 2006
On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 23:58, John Rudd wrote:
> >
> > A SHOULD is _never_ a requirement.
> The section of RFC 1912 that I quoted directly contradicts you. It
> lists a should, and outlines that the consequence for deviating from the
> should may be denial of service. Therefore, it specifically states that
> a should _may_be_ a requirement for service. Period.
It is saying that there are circumstances other than RFC
requirement compliance that can cause interoperability
problems - like sites that add their own arbitrary
requirements. That's just a realistic observation. You
can't use that to say any RFC justifies these additional
requirements even though the SHOULDs give best practices
to work around them.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list