[Mimedefang] Sendmail 8.13.7 relased
johnpc at xs4all.nl
Wed Jun 14 17:41:04 EDT 2006
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 04:41:30PM -0400, Cormack, Ken wrote:
> If it's faster to get the answer from a smaller piece of code, sendmail has
> posted a small milter of their own
> (ftp://ftp.sendmail.org/pub/sendmail/nesting-filter-1.0.0.tar.gz), to screen
> out emails with deeply-nested parts. Would grokking the code for this be
> faster than sendmail, and still provide the needed insight?
I briefly studied that code, and it doesn't really help because this
code can already return "SMFIS_REJECT" at xxfi_body() time. Mimedefang
doesn't allow interactivity with sendmail at that level.
However, if you then look at the milter_data() routine in milter.c from
the sendmail source, then it becomes obvious that sendmail calls all
"data section" related milter calls for one milter in succession,
so it doesn't really matter whether you return the reject from
xxfi_body() or only at xxfi_eom()...
So: MIMEDefang is good enough (as I already said in my previous
Jan-Pieter Cornet <johnpc at xs4all.nl>
!! Disc lamer: The addressee of this email is not the intended recipient. !!
!! This is only a test of the echelon and data retention systems. Please !!
!! archive this message indefinitely to allow verification of the logs. !!
More information about the MIMEDefang