[Mimedefang] mimedefang and clamav

[Speedy Sweedy]

>
>I find it hard to believe that anyone has over 50% e-mail traffic consist
>of viruses unless (1) you normally get almost no mail, or (2) some internal
>user is infected.

It hasn't always been this bad, and it may just be a temporary thing, but it 
has been going on now for about a month.  It's only a few user accounts that 
these emails are going to so the other thing I could do is re-assign new 
email addresses and just bounce the old accounts.  It might be worth the 
overhead to sendmail rather than the overhead of clamav and discard.

>
> > Yes, this is exactly why I wanted to have mimedefang make a second call
> > to clamav once it passes clamav the first time.
>
>But if you're doing that, then where are the savings?

I find that clamav is less overhead than mimedefang.  If I can call clamav 
first, before mimedefang and discard any emails be it gets to mimedefang, I 
think i will see a savings on the proc.

_________________________________________________________________
Designer Mail isn't just fun to send, it's fun to receive. Use special 
stationery, fonts and colors. 
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines 
  Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the 
first two months FREE*.