[Mimedefang] slaves

David F. Skoll dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Tue Nov 2 12:16:36 EST 2004

On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Button, Shawn wrote:

> I bumped the 3 timeouts up to 15 minutes and it appears, just at a
> cursory examination, to now have more time outs (about 8 per hour versus
> about 4 per hour previously).

Did you increase the multiplexor busy timeout as well?  MX_BUSY in the
standard startup files.

> For some reason mail is still being rejected when the filter times
> out...is there a way to allow the mail through instead of rejecting it
> if the filter times out? We removed the F=T flag in the mc but this
> didn't seem to help. It would at least buy us some time to hunt this
> down more.

If you hit MX_BUSY, then the mail will be tempfailed regardless of the
F=T setting, because that's a policy decision made by mimedefang rather
than by sendmail.



More information about the MIMEDefang mailing list