Stewart James wrote: > OK. > > It's .72, I remeber reading somewhere it was an issue in 0.70 but had > been fixed. (and osrry to all for not inluding version numbers. > > Hmmm.. it was supposed to have been fixed in 0.72, we couldn't use 0.72 because of a Proxy issue, so I can't confirm if it actually did get fixed there. Bill