[Mimedefang] A Bit of Confusion - Solved but differentproblemwithCLAMD
Peter A. Cole
peteracole at bigpond.com
Tue Feb 24 02:53:52 EST 2004
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob" <rob_macgregor at hotmail.com>
To: <mimedefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 3:26 AM
Subject: RE: [Mimedefang] A Bit of Confusion - Solved but
differentproblemwithCLAMD
> Odd, I made my change to mimedefang-filter and it worked:
>
> $ClamdSock = "/var/run/clamav/clamd";
>
I had a closer look today, and the require entry for mimedefang-filter is
BEFORE the line $ClamdSock = "/var/spool/MIMEDefang/clamd.sock" in
mimedefang.pl, so obviously it is overwritten by this setting.
Maybe it's just a Debian package thing?
>
> This has been discussed in the past and examples are in the archive,
> however... I use the following to strip out all existing recipients, add
> them in a header (in the event that it becomes relevant in future) and set
> the recipient to postmaster:
>
> # Record who it was for
> action_add_header("X-Orig-Rcpts", join(", ", @Recipients));
>
> # Remove oroginal recipients
> foreach $recip (@Recipients) {
> delete_recipient($recip);
> }
>
> # Send to the postmaster
> add_recipient('postmaster at my.domain');
>
Below is what I added to my sub filter_end section:
if ($hits >= $req) {
md_graphdefang_log('spam', $hits, $RelayAddr);
# If you find the SA report useful, add it, I guess...
action_add_part($entity, "text/plain", "-suggest",
"$report\n",
"SpamAssassinReport.txt", "inline");
# Add a header with original recipients, just for info
action_add_header("X-Orig-Rcpts", join(", ", @Recipients));
# Remove original recipients
foreach $recip (@recipients) {
delete_recipient($recip);
}
# Send to spam address
add_recipient('tangles at starpoint.local');
} else {
# Delete any existing X-Spam-Score header?
action_delete_header("X-Spam-Score");
Don't worry about the lack of brackets as I've only copied the pertinent
bits.
By the way, I did look through the archives, and they looked close enough to
this to be identical, so maybe my problem lies elsewhere?
>
> PLEASE - keep list traffic on the list. Email sent directly to me may be
> ignored utterly.
>
> --
> Rob | What part of "no" was it you didn't understand?
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list