[Mimedefang] SA 2.50

[Stefano McGhee]

Thanks to all of you that replied.  I got the courage to upgrade!  Only
problem I had afterwards were a bunch of errors in my maillog complaining of
incorrect versions in /usr/share/spamassassin and other errors.  One error
talked about running SA with -c, but I had no idea where that would be done.
So, I backed up the spamassassin directory, reinstalled and it works fine
now.  BTW, did you see that messages from this list plings the test
KNOWN_MAILING_LIST?  Congratulations, David, you are "known" for your
mailing list :-D

Thank you and cheers,

Stefano


> On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Adam Beatham wrote:
>
> > I haven't done a terrible amount of testing/monitoring of it.  But from
the
> > get-go, it appears to be a lot more efficient in catching spam.  I've
> > already noticed a decline in false positives.  So it's been good for me.
>
> I'll second that; even with the Bayesian rules disabled, SA 2.50 seems
> a lot better at catching spam than 2.44.
>