[Mimedefang] SpamAssassin 2.40

[Roedel, Mark]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Beatham [mailto:adam at backboard.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 11:37 AM
> To: mimedefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com; 
> mimedefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
> Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] SpamAssassin 2.40
> 
> 
> Sorry if this is a dumb, obvious question.. but in regards to 
> below.. This wouldn't affect people using MD/SA, because SA isn't
> really delivering the mail, correct?

That's correct.  We fit into the "MTA-level integration" bit down there.


---
Mark Roedel           | "The most overlooked advantage to owning a
Systems Programmer    |  computer is that if they foul up there's no
LeTourneau University |  law against whacking them around a little."
Longview, Texas  USA  |                        -- Owen Porterfield
 

 
> At 09:12 AM 9/3/2002 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
> >The #1 big change:
> >
> >- SpamAssassin now *REQUIRES* procmail for local delivery 
> > support; "-P" option is now the default.  Unless you use
> > procmail, Mail::Audit, Kmail, or an MTA-level integration,
> > do not upgrade blindly, your mail *WILL* spill all over
> > the floor in a big mess.