[Mimedefang] Possible Attack?
David F. Skoll
dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Wed May 1 16:46:05 EDT 2002
> Are these messages valid?
It depends on your definition of "valid". :-)
> Apr 28 17:24:17 access sendmail[30994]: g3SLOGXl030987: Truncated MIME
> Content-Type header due to field size (length = 44) (possible attack)
Somebody is setting the (undocumented) MaxMimeHeaderLength value in
your configuration file. These are Sendmail messages, not MIMEDefang
messages.
Regards,
David.
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list