[Mimedefang] Mimedefang 2.3 beta 3 and Spam Assassin 2.0

David F. Skoll dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Thu Jan 10 10:53:40 EST 2002

> I beleive the problem may be differences in the
> constructor call in mimedefang and how its actually defined in Spam Assassin
> 2.0.

Ah, that explains it.  I've only tested MIMEDefang with SpamAssassin 1.5.
I don't believe 2.0 was marked as stable on the Web site.



More information about the MIMEDefang mailing list