[Mimedefang] Mimedefang with Anomy and SpamAssassin

[Rich West]

Hrmm.. or could the base64 barf have been caused by the fact that my 
spamassassin.cf file was empty?

I am wondering if I should try to find SA1.5 and experiment with that...

-RIch


David F. Skoll wrote:

>On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Rich West wrote:
>
>>I'm using SpamAssassin 2.01, actually...
>>
>
>I have tested only SpamAssassin 1.5, and that's the version I would
>recommend.  They seem to have made major changes between 1.5 and 2.0,
>and there may be some instability.
>
>>Just a thought.. could the base64 barf be caused by SpamAssassin trying
>>to decode (or defang) the already decoded (or defang'ed) MIME message?
>>
>
>The call to spam_assassin_is_spam feeds it the un-decoded original
>input message.  SA was not really designed for integration with a
>system which has already decoded message parts.
>
>--
>David.
>

-- 
Richard West                            mailto:richard.west at divatv.com
Sr. Systems Administrator
Diva - Princeton, NJ                    http://www.divatv.com