This mail is probably spam.  The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future.  See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.

Content preview:  On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 14:30, Philip Prindeville wrote:
  > Les Mikesell wrote: > > >I reject values that can only be reached by
  my local settings > >for viagra/porn, and send the rest through with
  the score > >value arranged for easy individual filtering (the asterisk
  list > >as the first thing in the header). > > > > Can you post your
  configs and diffs? [...] 

Content analysis details:   (94.60 points, 5 required)
IN_REP_TO          (-0.5 points) Has a In-Reply-To header
REFERENCES         (-0.5 points) Has a valid-looking References header
EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION  (-0.5 points) BODY: Contains what looks like an email attribution
ADULT_SITE         (100.0 points)BODY: Possible porn - Adult Web Sites
QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT  (-0.5 points) BODY: Contains what looks like a quoted email text
REPLY_WITH_QUOTES  (-0.5 points) Reply with quoted text
USER_AGENT_XIMIAN  (-2.9 points) Headers indicate a non-spam MUA (Ximian)


X-FS-Spam-Score: ****************************************