No, Jim.  We're not using that function.

The strange thing is the 4.3.2 suggests a problem on my end, and the mention
of "milter" in the log entries suggests that sendmail is either waiting on
MIMEDefang, or that MIMEDefang is perhaps waiting on File::Scan, Vexira, or
CLAMD.

However, all day long, my systems have successfully processed emails with
larger attachments, coming from hosts no faster or slower than the problem
domain, and have done so during periods of much higher traffic than the
times when the tempfails began.  It only seems to be happening with respect
to the one problem domain.

Ken

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim McCullars [mailto:jim@info.uah.edu] 
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 1:41 PM
To: 'mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com'
Subject: RE: [Mimedefang] Trying to find cause of tempfails




On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Cormack, Ken wrote:

> Might anyone else have other pointers as to where I should look?

   Ken, I had this happen to me a while back, and it turned out that the
4xx was the return from a call to md_check_against_smtp_server().  Are you
using that in your filter?

Jim McCullars
University of Alabama in Huntsville


_______________________________________________
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

