On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 10:40 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> I meant more along what are you doing with SPF.  Are you rejecting mail? Are
> you creating a header? Etc.  I believe someone else already posted that if
> you have headers with SPF status in them, you can trigger on those headers
> using SpamAssassin or MD quite easily.
> 
> So basically, what do you have sendmail doing based on SPF records?  I'm
> assuming you may be rejecting connections and that would mean you would
> ignore SPF in sendmail and fall down to the MD level to implement the SPF
> check which could have dubious gains.
> 
> Perhaps a better question is: What problem are you trying to solve that the
> SPF<->Sendmail tie-in doesn't provide?

All valid questions. Lets see, i currently have sendmail doing the
headers and also doing the checks, though i may move this out in favor
of spfmilter doing it, tho i prefer c to perl for performance. I was
really looking for alternative approaches to my sendmail-spf
implementation, as i have some other checks (i.e. sid-milter and
dk-milter) checks i wanted to do the same thing for if possible.

Michael Weiner

All information contained in this email is confidential and may be used by the intended recipient only.
