[Mimedefang] spam score different from when scanning via mimedefang
info at bsolution.net
info at bsolution.net
Thu Oct 16 12:36:17 EDT 2014
On 2014-10-16 12:13, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> I don't know that you are missing anything. I'm assuming time has
> elapsed between these two tests because you are showing different
> Bayes scores, different RBL hits, etc. which would indicate that the
> RBLs reactively added information after you received the email.
>
but why Bayes rules are so different? shouldn't they be relatively close
?
> However, overall, I think I would focus on a few things to improve
> your installation and not focus on the MD vs CLI differences as I
> think that's a red-herring. Someone else might notice something I'm
> not, though.
>
> 1 - URIBL_BLOCKED means your DNS queries are being blocked. See
> https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists under the first
> Q&A. Short answer, install a caching local nameserver fixes this
> issue for most installations
>
Thanks i will try this.
> 2 - Your required score of 3.0 is very aggressively low. We suggest 5
> and I often use 5.0 to 6.5 for more real world usage.
>
> 3 - Consider adding KAM.cf
>
> 4 - Switch AWL to TxRep
>
i will look into the 3 and 4 as well.
Thank you.
> regards,
> KAM
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
> message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
>
> Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
> MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
> http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list