[Mimedefang] ClamAV effectiveness
dave at osbourne.uk.eu.org
Fri Jun 28 11:21:37 EDT 2013
I can't say that I've noticed it being particuarly ineffective (or
rather the number blocks from Clam have not changed significantly) and
there hasn't been an influx of complaints.
We're using clamav-0.97.6 which is 2 versions out of date...
On 28/06/2013 16:05, David F. Skoll wrote:
> I assume a few people on this list use ClamAV. Have you noticed that
> it has become next to useless for detecting viruses? The latest rash of
> fax spams that contain EXEs inside ZIPs just seem to sail past ClamAV.
> We always hold EXEs and EXEs inside ZIPs, so our clients are safe, but
> really ClamAV is not doing its job.
> Are others noticing it? And if you use commercial AV software, does it
> seem to do a better job than ClamAV?
> NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
> message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
> Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
> MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
More information about the MIMEDefang