[Mimedefang] X-Auto-Response-Suppress header
David F. Skoll
dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Mon May 21 15:47:04 EDT 2012
On Mon, 21 May 2012 12:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
kd6lvw at yahoo.com wrote:
> Definently not. A rejected message (returned to the sender) gets
> more action (or administrative notice) than one accepted as spam
> therefore unanswered.
Rejecting a message containing an X-Auto-Response-Suppress is not only
pointless, but it violates the RFCs, which permit any sort of X-* header.
Rejecting communication with Microsoft Exchange is an interesting
position to take and I sympathise on a philosophical level, but it's
tilting at windmills. Completely impractical if you actually rely on
email for business communication.
Regards,
David.
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list