[Mimedefang] MIMEDefang 2.73-BETA-2 is available

[Philip Prindeville]

On 1/19/12 6:49 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> Right now, you can work around it by putting:
> 
>       umask(007);
> 
> near the top of your mimedefang-filter file, outside any subroutine definition.


If we do that, then the -G flag will be in force in mimedefang-filter whether it's specified or not.

Here's a patch I'm proposing: have activateSlave() change its umask() after the fork() and before the exec().

-Philip
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: mimedefang-multiplexor-umask.patch
URL: <https://lists.mimedefang.org/pipermail/mimedefang_lists.mimedefang.org/attachments/20120119/cd47e46f/attachment.ksh>