[Mimedefang] MIMEDefang 2.73 is Released

[kd6lvw at yahoo.com]

--- On Mon, 2/6/12, David F. Skoll <dfs at roaringpenguin.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 11:50:49 -0800 (PST) kd6lvw at yahoo.com wrote:
> > In filter_end(), I reference the hash %RecipientMailer mainly for
> > logging purposes, but also to compare against certain mailboxes which
> > resolve to a local spamtrap.
> 
> > Using 2.73, all three values of the hash for a given recipient
> > display as a single question mark in the log.
> 
> It's a bug.  I don't include rcpt_mailer, rcpt_host or rcpt_addr in
> the list of macros we want at the SMFIM_ENVRCPT stage.
> 
> Workaround until I fix it:  Invoke mimedefang with the
> options:
> 
>     mimedefang ... -a '{rcpt_mailer}' -a
> '{rcpt_host}' -a '{rcpt_addr}
> 
> Sorry about that!

Ah, so something did change.  OK.  So, you build up the hash from the individual calls to filter_rcpt()?

Instead of your fix, I'll just continue running version 2.72 for a while.

Some of my spamtraps operate using regex expression matches on the local-part of a mailbox, so it's alot easier checking the result (a single value) than the input.  In my spam reporting, I evaluate (score >= min OR trap = TRUE) to do lart reporting, and this issue goes to latter part of that expression.