[Mimedefang] Reputation Reporting Protocol submitted to IETF as an I-D

Andrzej Adam Filip anfi at onet.eu
Sat Jun 19 15:06:47 EDT 2010


"David F. Skoll" <dfs at roaringpenguin.com> wrote:
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>
>> IMHO you should "generalize" support for different signature types
>> e.g. 1 extra byte for signature length and 1 extra byte for signature type
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "signature types".  Could you explain?
> Are you referring to the truncated HMAC?
> [...]

Yes. IMHO you should create protocol capable to support other
"sender signature" types even if for long time only one
type is going to be supported.

-- 
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : anfi at onet.eu
Luck, that's when preparation and opportunity meet.
  -- P. E. Trudeau



More information about the MIMEDefang mailing list