[Mimedefang] Delivery agents (was Re: auto reply / vacation)
David F. Skoll
dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Tue Feb 2 11:15:35 EST 2010
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Having yet to see a 100% accurate spam filter, you are correct. I run a
> tagging-only spam filter and strongly recommend the use of tagging-only
> spam filters. Philosophical debate and I'm sure we both have strong and
> valid opinions not worthy arguing here ;-)
Well, our spam filter has a quarantine from which we can release FPs.
So we get the best of both worlds: The ability to release FPs without
having to process tagged mail in our delivery agents.
[...]
> Anyway, I know I had a quite a long patch for vacation. It's a bit of
> conjecture and recalling emails from 7 years ago, but I seem to remember
> that they referred to vacation a bit as an unloved stepchild.
You're probably right.
> In short, they listened but adding flexibility to vacation to deal with
> (or not deal with as the case may be) spam, etc. was not on their list
> of goals and they pointed me towards procmail.
Somewhat OT... has anyone had experience with Mail::Audit to replace
procmail?
http://search.cpan.org/~rjbs/Mail-Audit-2.225/lib/Mail/Audit.pm
I *detest* the procmail syntax, and keep meaning One Of These Days
to poke around with Mail::Audit.
Regards,
David.
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list