David F. Skoll
dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Tue Nov 24 15:48:46 EST 2009
Michiel Brandenburg wrote:
> What might be a nice tradeoff is using the socket map feature of
> sendmail to hook sendmail into mimedefang that way. Dunno how that
> would impact performance but it might be a nice tradeoff.
Performance impact is severe. We used the sockemap -> MIMEDefang
path in an older version of our commercial software, but we had
to remove it and use a different technique because of the horrible
> As I recall the socket map protocol is pretty lightweight but might
> still be too slow, in my case it works fine even with about 1/2 mails
> per sec.
We tend to concentrate our optimizations on medium-sized
installations, by which I mean about 25 msgs/second (= about 2
million/day) or higher. The low-end ones aren't worth worrying about
just because the load is easily managed.
More information about the MIMEDefang