[Mimedefang] Greylisting post-data (was Re: [PATCH] filter_data implementation)

David F. Skoll dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Thu May 28 09:40:43 EDT 2009

Jeff Rife wrote:

> Based on the full text of the RFCs and not just the examples, "450" 
> seems to be a perfectly acceptable temporary failure.

I read them differently.  I see 450, 451 and 452 as acceptable after
the final dot, but only 421 in direct response to DATA.  (I'm basing
my interpretation on RFC 5321.)



More information about the MIMEDefang mailing list