[Mimedefang] Greylisting post-data (was Re: [PATCH] filter_data implementation)

[David F. Skoll]

Jeff Rife wrote:

> Based on the full text of the RFCs and not just the examples, "450" 
> seems to be a perfectly acceptable temporary failure.

I read them differently.  I see 450, 451 and 452 as acceptable after
the final dot, but only 421 in direct response to DATA.  (I'm basing
my interpretation on RFC 5321.)

Regards,

David.