[Mimedefang] after body rejects and deliver :-)
Andrzej Adam Filip
anfi at onet.eu
Fri Jan 16 18:31:17 EST 2009
Jeff Makey <jeff at sdsc.edu> wrote:
>>Has anybody used mimedefang in additional "reject after body but mark
>>and deliver too"?
> The best way I found to do this is to have the milter send a copy of
> the marked message via a new sendmail subprocess, then reject as usual
> in the milter.
Thanks for the suggestion [option zero].
> Rejecting and delivering is a blatant violation of the RFCs, but it
> can be useful for suspected spam.
Delivering (to separate folder) solely for purpose of "reporting as
spam" (if the recipients decides to spend some time to take a look and
confirm) is quite unlike "standard delivery" (IMHO).
It would break the letter but not the spirit (IMHO).
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : anfi at onet.eu : anfi at xl.wp.pl
You get what you pay for.
-- Gabriel Biel
More information about the MIMEDefang