[Mimedefang] Testing for port #/TLS in filter_relay
kelson at speed.net
Fri Feb 29 19:51:42 EST 2008
Philip Prindeville wrote:
> What about adding extra parameters to relayok and/or filter_relay()?
> mfconnect() has all the state it needs to pass the port # to MXRelayOK().
Sorry if I missed something earlier in the thread, but is there a reason
that what you're doing can't/shouldn't be done in filter_sender?
I seem to recall that this was where most people originally did MD-based
relay tests, before filter_relay was added. And as far as efficiency
goes, it's pretty much the same as running sendmail with delay_checks
SpeedGate Communications <www.speed.net>
More information about the MIMEDefang