Auto-responders (was Re: [Mimedefang] ADMINISTRIVIA: Out-of-office replies)
David F. Skoll
dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Thu Sep 6 14:39:00 EDT 2007
-ray wrote:
> So while we're on the subject, what is the proper way for an
> auto-responder to tell if this is a mailing list? We use a procmail
> script that pulls a vacation message from LDAP for our users.
There are several clues that an auto-response would be bad:
1) Precedence: list
(Sendmail's "vacation" program won't send out a reply if it sees
that header.)
2) The various List-* headers (RFC 2919)
3) The fact that your e-mail address does not appear in a To: or Cc: header.
Again, "vacation" will not reply to message unless your e-mail address
(or a set of aliases that you configure) appears in To: or Cc:.
> Does the presence of a "Precedence: list" header always denote mailing
> list?
No, but it's almost always the case.
> Also when we reply, I add a
> "Precedence: junk (autoreply)" header. Is that also standard/correct?
Yes. You should also add an:
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
header. (RFC 3834)
Regards,
David.
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list