[Mimedefang] Questions about stream_by_recipient and problems it creates.
Steffen Kaiser
skmimedefang at smail.inf.fh-bonn-rhein-sieg.de
Wed Jan 24 03:53:17 EST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
> tagged and recipient B wants spam rejected, then we reject the message
> with "Recipient B thinks this is spam (message was delivered to other
> recipients)" then in filter_end we queue the message for recipient A.
Hmm:
a) it's not Recipient B thinking the mail is SPAM, but the automated
filter.
b) when Recipient B would think like so, to delete the mail should be OK.
c) Because it's an automated delete, better log it, so Admin G can defend
himself in case Manager M wants his head pulled off.
I wonder if users would accept daily or weekly batched "drop" notices,
like:
Hello Recipient B,
according to your SPAM settings the following mails had been silently
deleted, the sender was NOT informed thereabout:
Id Date From Subject
l034x 2007-01-10 eagle at example.com Eagle version 1.0 is available
...
if you think, one of the mails was discarded in error, please re-request
the information from the sender _and_ inform Admin G about the falsely
deleted mail (Please include the Id of the mail).
Bye,
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBRbcefugJIbZtwg6XAQLHXwf/ZggAMDk/IOW18DuSDR5rQ8Tvff/kUFMZ
3YS5/2jCmZflRW/U4T/uwS5oM6zDutaQEdpn6SP8QpRJrMSF303DksySQHG7Nj7w
1i6JIT92HngJfznc6AQeacBShi5RIWlX59cG2CO8WKnM3PcQvZNOR6qPfkhC7GA/
TH7mlciF1jb3fdHj+lqVl6tkjMvpXkGTiEPvMnoCs05FfTgUmIVkZN+7NBYgfgyi
d7BG7U0UTV1Mz6szPIixFLjhuoUO1EHtwSa0ZghwZHbMf7KqX3agkcQFbizeB8gV
6/hnIF72OF8lwnzNVbFF6aO2X33emzNsub7foSK2VynaVTRr46eD5w==
=hH5I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list