[Mimedefang] compare mimedefang to mailscanner
David F. Skoll
dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Tue Jan 16 18:22:34 EST 2007
Kees Theunissen wrote:
> I'm not sure that this [scanning for viruses first] is cheaper.
It depends on what you do with the mail. If you discard or
reject spam or spam scoring above a threshold, then it's almost
certainly cheaper to spam-scan first. If you're only tagging spam
but throwing away viruses, it's probably cheaper to virus-scan first.
The fact that clamd has phishing signatures muddies the waters a bit;
there may be some "viruses" that are really spam.
Regards,
David.
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list