[Mimedefang] Questions about synthesize_received_header()

[David F. Skoll]

Philip Prindeville wrote:

> I was looking at this function, and was wondering if
> the (MimeDefang) comment was necessary... or perhaps
> making it read "via MimeDefang" instead (as per RFC-822).

I suppose... it's a small point; not sure it's worth changing.

> Also, the "for" information only specifies the first recipient.

Not quite.  If there's more than one recipient, we don't add the "for"
clause.  Otherwise, we add it.  That's how Sendmail works, and it's
the only safe way to avoid leaking Bcc: information.

--
David.