ClamAV 0.90 (was Re: [Mimedefang] Mailing List still Active)

David Koski dkoski at umich.edu
Wed Feb 14 16:41:25 EST 2007


Have you noticed the increase in detection in just the standard portion of
the code or is that with the experimental code as well?

	Thanks

		David

-----Original Message-----
From: mimedefang-bounces at lists.roaringpenguin.com
[mailto:mimedefang-bounces at lists.roaringpenguin.com] On Behalf Of David F.
Skoll
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 1:44 PM
To: mimedefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
Subject: ClamAV 0.90 (was Re: [Mimedefang] Mailing List still Active)

Stefan Schoeman wrote:

> I just thought I'd see a lot of mail regarding the ClamAV upgrade to
> 0.90 and the apparent breaking of Mail::ClamAV in the process.

I don't use Mail::ClamAV (just the normal MIMEDefang Clam integration)
and Clam 0.90 seems to be running fine.  It seems to catch a lot
more phishing spams than earlier versions.

Regards,

David.
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

!DSPAM:45d359eb152933868113833!







More information about the MIMEDefang mailing list