[Mimedefang] Memory Limit Variables?

[Mack]

Yup, i read the bugzilla on it where it was in, and then removed (a long
time back...)

The -VE rules should be run before the +VE rules, i would have thought tbh,
(simple order of rules in the compile). Since i can't see any -VE rules
dependant on +VE rules <- maybe i'm being hopeful on that one lol. <--
however i suppose to bring rule ordering to SA would mean a huge re-write i
guess

and to get the multi-threshold part (ie diff ppl wanting diff things), it
should be a passeble parameter to the spam_assassin_check() call ! :)

here's to hoping



-----Original Message-----
From: mimedefang-bounces at lists.roaringpenguin.com
[mailto:mimedefang-bounces at lists.roaringpenguin.com]On Behalf Of David
F. Skoll
Sent: 12 April 2007 21:36
To: mimedefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] Memory Limit Variables?


Mack wrote:

[Re: Stop SA analysis when you hit your spam threshold]

> That's a shame then... is there and option for it, or summit to
> raise on the SA mailing list ?

Well, you can have negative-weighted rules, so knowing whether or not
it's safe to stop can be tricky.

Also, some people have multiple thresholds: 5 = file as spam; 10 =
auto-reject.  So you'd need to keep going anyway until you hit the
highest possible threshold (and know for sure there are no
negative-weighted rules left.)

Given the architecture of SpamAssassin, I doubt this will be implemented
any time soon.

Regards,

David.
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

This Email Has Been Anti-Virus Scanned