spamd vs. builtin SA (was Re: [Mimedefang] Patch: adding custom headers for SpamAssassin)
David F. Skoll
dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Thu Nov 23 10:00:01 EST 2006
Jan-Pieter Cornet wrote:
> But, given the fact that we just switched to using spamd instead of
> the builtin Mail::SpamAssassin modules, we don't really need support
> builtin to mimedefang at the moment either...
Just curious: Why the switch? Do you see better performance?
Regards,
David.
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list