spamd vs. builtin SA (was Re: [Mimedefang] Patch: adding custom headers for SpamAssassin)

David F. Skoll dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Thu Nov 23 10:00:01 EST 2006


Jan-Pieter Cornet wrote:

> But, given the fact that we just switched to using spamd instead of
> the builtin Mail::SpamAssassin modules, we don't really need support
> builtin to mimedefang at the moment either...

Just curious: Why the switch?  Do you see better performance?

Regards,

David.



More information about the MIMEDefang mailing list