[Mimedefang] Re: MIMEDefang spec file (was Re: More on mimedefang and x86_64)

[Scott Silva]

David F. Skoll spake the following on 11/19/2006 5:19 PM:
> Philip Prindeville wrote:
> 
> [a bunch of comments on the .spec file]
> 
> I don't have any RPM-based Linux systems, except for some QEMU virtual
> machines for building our commercial products, so I haven't been
> maintaining the spec file.  If there's a Red Hat or Fedora user out
> there who wants to submit patches to the spec file, I'll gratefully
> accept them.  It probably needs some work.
> 
> Specific questions:
> 
>> should we add /lib64 and /usr/lib64 before /lib and /usr/lib,
>> respectively?
> 
> Yes.  We do this with our CanIt spec file; it should be ported back
> into the MIMEDefang spec file.
> 
>> Oh, and do we need the symbol file for /usr/bin/mimedefang
>> to put into mimedefang-debuginfo-2.58?
> 
> I have no idea. :-) We've pretty much been a Debian / Ubuntu shop for
> the last few years, and I'm out of touch with the world of RPM.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> David.
Dag Wieers has a apt/yum repo for RedHat and clones that has a somewhat
patched spec file. You might look at it.
http://dag.wieers.com/packages/mimedefang/mimedefang.spec


-- 

MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!