[Mimedefang] More on filter_helo
David F. Skoll
dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Thu Nov 9 13:06:19 EST 2006
Philip Prindeville wrote:
> So... duplicating filter_helo() in filter_vrfy(), filter_expn(),
> filter_rtrn(),
> and any other command that can come immediately after a HELO is
> somehow better.
Because of the way MIMEDefang works, the filter_vrfy() may be called in
a completely different Perl process than the filter_helo() was, so you
still would need to pass the HELO information as a parameter if you
want to use it in filter_vrfy().
That's why filter_recipient() includes all the info in filter_sender(),
and filter_sender() includes all of filter_helo(), etc.
--
David.
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list