[Mimedefang] More on filter_helo

David F. Skoll dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Thu Nov 9 13:06:19 EST 2006


Philip Prindeville wrote:

> So... duplicating filter_helo() in filter_vrfy(), filter_expn(),
> filter_rtrn(),
> and any other command that can come immediately after a HELO is
> somehow better.

Because of the way MIMEDefang works, the filter_vrfy() may be called in
a completely different Perl process than the filter_helo() was, so you
still would need to pass the HELO information as a parameter if you
want to use it in filter_vrfy().

That's why filter_recipient() includes all the info in filter_sender(),
and filter_sender() includes all of filter_helo(), etc.

--
David.



More information about the MIMEDefang mailing list