[Mimedefang] Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Fw: Interesting Phishing Trick

[Kenneth Porter]

--On Wednesday, March 08, 2006 10:12 PM -0500 "David F. Skoll" 
<dfs at roaringpenguin.com> wrote:

> Ooh!  You're onto something!  Allowing only strictly-validated HTML
> would have the same effect as disallowing HTML altogether, but would
> be far easier to justify to the PHBs as a
> security/compliance/standards/pick_your_buzzword issue...

I'm not religiously opposed to HTML, if its ability to carry spam and 
viruses is neutered. (That includes rejecting the same material rejected by 
most web forums.)

So does anyone know of a good plug-in validator that can be dropped into MD 
relatively painlessly? I know the W3C online validator has been released 
for local website deployment (to validate private web pages).

<http://validator.w3.org/source/>

Other validators:

<http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/>
<http://valet.webthing.com/page/>