[Mimedefang] Re: Non-routable addresses in HELO
Paul Russell
prussell at nd.edu
Tue Jul 11 14:30:22 EDT 2006
On 11 Jul 2006, Jan-Pieter Cornet <johnpc at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Also note that I'm not aware of any SMTP server implementation that
> actually enforces syntactic checks on the HELO or EHLO argument out
> of the box (resulting in lots of clients sending utter crap). Also
> note that blocking based on EHLO will produce some false positives:
> there are legitimate mail servers out there that EHLO as, eg.
> "lan.local" or something silly.
Any mail server that is so poorly administered that is not offering a properly
formatted HELO argument is not legitimate and should not be connected to the
Internet. The RFC clearly states that the server *MUST* use a FQDN or bracketed
literal IP address as the HELO argument. Anything else is explicitly prohibitted
and grounds for rejecting the connection.
--
Paul Russell, Senior Systems Administrator
OIT Messaging Services Team
University of Notre Dame
prussell at nd.edu
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list