[Mimedefang] MIMEDefang 2.55 is released

[ms at interspace.net]

> To be honest, I don't think filter_helo is useful.  It has the same
> effect as filtering on HELO during MAIL (because of the way Sendmail
> works), so I really think it's a waste of time.

I am not a perl guru and am only a user of the mimedefang and not a 
contributer,
BUT, i have to agree with (GURU) David...
The regular filter sender is hadling the 'helo' quite well and it only 
a command
away from the 'helo' command...?!? so what is the cost benefit?

10x David and other for a great tool!

Meni

>
> However, for consistency, I suppose we should add MX_HELO_CHECK support
> to the Red Hat init files.
>
> Regards,
>
> David.
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
> message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.
>
> Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
> MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
> http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
>