[Mimedefang] Adding filter_helo support
David F. Skoll
dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Tue Jan 17 15:35:08 EST 2006
Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> But it breaks existing filters; we need the helo arg back.
>> And there's a good reason to pass HELO in filter_sender (and
>> filter_recipient, for that matter): You may WANT to defer your
>> HELO processing until later. Our commercial products, for
>> example, let individual recipients decide if they want to use
>> various rules, which means we need to defer all processing
>> until at least RCPT.
> That's got to get hairy when you have multiple recipients specified.
It's hairy, but manageable. Doing per-recipient content-filtering is
a lot hairier and less managable; we have to use hacks like
stream_by_domain or stream_by_recipient. Unfortunately, that's just how
SMTP works.
Regards,
David.
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list