[Mimedefang] freshclam -- Is it a daemon?
Kelson
kelson at speed.net
Wed May 4 13:09:10 EDT 2005
WBrown at e1b.org wrote:
> Once an hour is not excessive at all. Now that it now uses a DNS styule
> lookup to query current version, it generates very little traffic to check
> hourly.
>
> The risk of checking less frequently is too high when a new virus outbreak
> occurs.
Indeed. We actually had three copies of Sober.P get through on Monday
morning during the half-hour between the first hit and the first
freshlcam after ClamAV added the signature.
Of course, by "get through" I mean "get defanged instead of discarded
outright" -- so it could have been considerably worse.
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications <www.speed.net>
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list