[Mimedefang] for mcafee lovers

[David F. Skoll]

Following up on myself...

> (Well, OK.  Some RP employees use Windoze at home, and I suppose they
> might check their e-mail from home, so Clam probably is more useful
> than I'm admitting... grumble grumble...)

My colleague Dave O'Neill pointed out that Clam has signatures
against phishing attacks (which are platform-independent.)  It blocks
about six per day for us.

Do any commercial AV scanners have phishing signatures?  If not, that's
a very strong argument for Clam.

Regards,

David.