[Mimedefang] Scary... Filtering on the outbound.
flatfender at gmail.com
Mon Feb 21 14:04:12 EST 2005
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:23:52 -0500 (EST), David F. Skoll
<dfs at roaringpenguin.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Ben Kamen wrote:
> > > 2) All kinds of regulations in the US like HIPAA and financial
> > > regulations will force businesses to at least pretend to control
> > > outflowing information. Unfortunately, doing this effectively means
> > > prohibiting tools like PGP for encrypted e-mail. :-(
> > So much for securing sensitive information with PGP so that only the
> > intended parties can read it.
> Well, there's a commercial solution (maybe a few) that work like this:
> 1) Health care agency X needs to send confidential information to client Y.
> 2) Person from X sends confidential mail to a special account, something like:
> Y-at-Y.DOMAIN at secret.X.domain
> 3) A magic process intercepts the mail, stores the confidential info on
> an HTTPS server, and sends mail to Y at Y.DOMAIN saying:
> "You have a confidential message at https://whatever"
> 4) Y logs in with his/her usernamd and password (which must have been
> sent out-of-band -- probably by regular mail) and reads the message.
> This avoids Y having to understand anything about PGP. I think it's a fairly
> cool solution.
Working for a health care related company we see this all the time.
It's funny they send the username and password and URL all in the same
I particularly don't like this whole setup. We have had to prove on a
number of occasions that a conversation regarding liability
disclosures had indeed taken place. If we have vendor that promises
something and we have to go to their website to retrieve the message,
then we have to print the message and store it as proof the
conversation took place. I am much more comfortable with having a
copy of the email electronically in my possession, in a users mail
store, archived with all our other corporate mail. Nothing to stop
the vendor from deleting an email on their webserver proving they knew
of something just go get out of a large claim, and if we didn't print
the email we would have no proof. I am a bigger fan of just
sanitizing the PHI out of email, manually if need be. But do not like
the get your email at this URL scam.
More information about the MIMEDefang