[Mimedefang] HUGE problem with mimedefang
David F. Skoll
dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Fri Apr 22 13:25:32 EDT 2005
James Ebright wrote:
> Would not this be a whole lot simpler using the new PING/PONG
> fucntions in MD?
Those only check the multiplexor, which in my experience is more
reliable than the milter part.
Also, NOT getting a response to a PING could just mean that all
slaves are busy.
> A little known function in net_snmp lets you create your own OIDs
> and populate em via scripts. We are currently using space under the
> UC-DAVIS/Redhat OID namespace but I have requested my own space, so
> when that happens I might change the scripts around.
Roaring Penguin has a private enterprise number; it is 10055.
There we are, at http://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers
Maybe we should come up with official SNMP MIB entries for monitoring
MIMEDefang?
Regards,
David.
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list