[Mimedefang] HUGE problem with mimedefang

David F. Skoll dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Fri Apr 22 13:25:32 EDT 2005


James Ebright wrote:

> Would not this be a whole lot simpler using the new PING/PONG
> fucntions in MD?

Those only check the multiplexor, which in my experience is more
reliable than the milter part.

Also, NOT getting a response to a PING could just mean that all
slaves are busy.

> A little known function in net_snmp lets you create your own OIDs
> and populate em via scripts. We are currently using space under the
> UC-DAVIS/Redhat OID namespace but I have requested my own space, so
> when that happens I might change the scripts around.

Roaring Penguin has a private enterprise number; it is 10055.
There we are, at http://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers

Maybe we should come up with official SNMP MIB entries for monitoring
MIMEDefang?

Regards,

David.




More information about the MIMEDefang mailing list